Do have have an under-reported story that screams out for more attention? Feel free to submit it here. Just add your link (and brief comments, if you'd like) in the comment section below. Please note that this section is moderated, so the link you submit will not be visible. But rest assured that this has been submitted and that I will look at it. I cannot promise that I will use each and every link submitted, but if I feel it's a good fit for the blog, I will most certainly post it.
Any looking into goings-on in Colombia are sure to uncover a trove of info that very very few Western news outlets will reveal.
ReplyDeleteColombia as it currently exists is a blueprint for the USA and the world at large, as envisioned by the Western financial/corporate oligarchs.
http://m.thenation.com/article/174589-horrific-costs-us-colombia-trade-agreement
Thanks. This is the type of story I'm looking for. I'll get this up in a day or two.
DeleteEbola patented
ReplyDeletehttp://www.naturalnews.com/046290_Ebola_patent_vaccines_profit_motive.html#
I will leave this link here, but there's a few things about both the story and the natural news site that I just don't like. Thanks for submitting.
DeleteThanks for putting this out there.
ReplyDeleteNowhere else on the planet is the US corporate/military/financial syndicate on display with more clarity than Central America, and just what might be in store for the States in the near future (I believe). Yet most Americans are clueless or only vaguely aware of how things play out for the average citizen of the region, blaming "corrupt governments" or maybe ethnic deficiencies for the plight of the immigrants attempting escape to the US proper. Honduras in recent years is just another hazy tragedy in most US news media, brought to light only due to the flood of minors across the border fleeing the conditions the US created. A staggering turnaround for a country that had a chance for better and was in fact making measurable progress. This article draws parallels between most of Central America and Nicaragua - a country that managed to hold out against the US State Dept.
http://www.fightbacknews.org/2014/8/7/central-american-refugee-children-victims-us-intervention-central-america
Is also a good deal more current than the last.
Good story. I'll get it up sometime soon. Thanks for submitting!
DeleteWho is who in EU commision
ReplyDeletehttp://new.euro-med.dk/20141110-a-further-jesuit-presidents-jean-claude-junckers-corrupt-eu-commission-corporations-have-now-bought-control-of-eu-kommission-the-electorate-ignored.php
http://www.seawapa.co/2014/06/europe-is-run-by-jesuits.html
I will leave these links here. The stories seem to be overall fine, but the foray into the role of Jesuits, even if true, is not something I feel comfortable going into at this time. Thanks for the submit though.
DeleteIs The Breakup Of Ukraine Inevitable?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2014/11/12/is-the-breakup-of-ukraine-inevitable/
Nice! I'll get this up soon. While a lot of stories coming out on "mainstream" sites are crap, I'm glad to see when a major publication such as Forbes gets a good part of the story correct because more people might begin paying attention. Thanks!
Deletehttp://www.gold-eagle.com/article/grandmaster-putins-golden-trap
DeleteThe research showed that people who favored the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile'
ReplyDeleteSo, among people who comment on news articles, those who discount official government accounts of events like the 9/11 attacks and the assassination of John F. Kennedy outnumber believers by more than two-to-one. That means the pro-conspiracy commenters are those who are now expressing what is considered conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters represent a small, beleaguered minority that is often scoffed at and shunned.
Perhaps becoming frustrated that their alleged mainstream viewpoints are no longer considered as such by the majority, those who are anti-conspiracy commenters often showed anger and disgust in their posts.
"The research... showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals," said the study.
http://www.naturalnews.com/047168_conspiracy_theorists_sanity_propaganda.html#
Again, I'll leave this link here for those who are interested, but one of the authors of the study has problems with the way this article represents his research.
DeleteMichael Wood2014 Nov 30 07:45 a.m. (3 days ago)edited 2 of 2 people found this helpful
As the first author of this study, I'd like to address a misleading headline that's been making the rounds lately: the idea that this study says that people who believe 9/11 conspiracy theories are better-adjusted than those who do not. This grossly misinterprets our results: this study says nothing about mental health, and its results do not justify any conclusions about one group of people being more or less "sane" than another.
The main basis for this misinterpretation appears to be the observed difference in hostility between conspiracist (pro-conspiracy-theory) and conventionalist (anti-conspiracy-theory) comments. On average, conventionalist comments tended to be somewhat more hostile. In the paper, we interpret this difference as the product of a fairly specific social situation in which the two rival opinion-based groups use different strategies of social influence according to their relative popularity, rather than as an inherent psychological difference. In fact, previous research by Marina Abalakina-Paap and colleagues has shown that dispositional hostility is positively, not negatively, correlated with beliefs in conspiracy theories - in other words, people who believe more conspiracy theories tend to be more hostile. However, that finding doesn't necessarily justify the conclusion that conventionalists are better-adjusted than conspiracists. Either of these conclusions relies on the unstated premise that hostility is never good or justified, and that less hostility is always better. This is at least an arguable assumption, and there's certainly no evidence for it here.
In general, I would urge anyone who found this paper via the "sanity" article to please think critically about headlines in the future. It is tempting to believe without question self-serving headlines that validate your prejudices and beliefs, but that's precisely when critical thinking is most important.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23847577
Operation Gladio B is the preferred weapon of “the company” (Pentagon, NATO, CIA & MI6) in the geopolitical struggle against Russia and China. This struggle is in full swing in many parts of the world but since the New Great Game in the Eurasian Balkans is of prime importance, the shadowy paramilitary Gladio network is particularly active in Central Asia, the Caucasus and Turkey. - See more at: http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2014/09/27/the-lone-gladio-reveals-washingtons-strategy-for-winning-the-new-great-game-a-review-by-christoph-germann/#sthash.5qjfikP1.dpuf
ReplyDeleteBTW. Death of White Widow in Ukraine and Crimean Tatar's unit fights for Kiev is telling something
A bit different from what I usually do, but I believe I can find a way to fit in it. Thanks.
Deletehttp://www.voltairenet.org/article185870.html
ReplyDeleteI'll get this up soon.
Deletehttp://m.spiegel.de/international/europe/a-1004706.html#spRedirectedFrom=www&referrrer=
ReplyDeleteI'll get this up soon.
Deletehttp://en.cyplive.com/ru/news/amerikanskaya-strategiya-spaseniya-dollara-razorvat-ekonomicheskoe-sotrudnichestvo-rossii-i-evropy-c.html
ReplyDeletehttp://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-conflict/2014/12/american-dollar-rescue-strategy-2454866.html
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sott.net/article/289733-EU-losers-Russia-scraps-South-Stream-pipeline-project-announces-major-alternative-gas-deal-Did-Putin-just-poach-Turkey
ReplyDeletehttp://johnhelmer.net/?p=12317
ReplyDeletehttp://www.stratfor.com/weekly/taking-strategic-intelligence-model-moscow#axzz3Kg3hSbSS
ReplyDelete